India Canada Tension
Begining of India Canada Tension: India was getting ready for a special session in the new Parliament building in Delhi on Tuesday a few hours prior to the arrival of the Members of Parliament. A startling statement was being made by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to the Canadian Parliament in Ottawa. He claimed that the Khalistani Tiger Force (KTF) member Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian citizen who had been designated a terrorist leader in India, was murdered by operatives working for the Indian government.
After fleeing a gurdwara in Surrey, Canada, Nijjar, a 45-year-old masked shooter, was shot and killed in India in June of this year. The Indian High Commission’s diplomats took the political decision to have Nijjar removed, despite the Canadian Prime Minister’s acknowledgement that the inquiry is still underway.
Reply of India in India Canada Tension
After the G20 Summit in India, when the two leaders had a tense bilateral “pulsaic” discussion, Mr. Trudeau was accused of the offenses listed above. Following their discussion, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trudeau had a meeting. In readouts, each accused the other of “foreign interference in Canada” and “providing safe haven to anti-India elements,” namely the Khalistani Tiger Force (KTF). Later on, it was discovered that Nijjar had been murdered, which brought up further issues.
The government had consistently asserted that no “specific evidence” had been presented by Canada, but it was also disclosed that Jodie Thomas, Canada’s National Security Advisor (NSA), had visited India twice in the previous month to discuss the matter with Ajit Doval, India’s NSA. One more reason for India Canada Tension.
The “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance, which consists of the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, was said to have exchanged intelligence by Canada, according to stories in the American media, and some of its leaders reportedly spoke with Prime Minister Modi about the matter. India retaliated in like after Mr. Trudeau’s comments in Parliament by expelling a Canadian diplomat. In response to the claims, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued a demarche to Canada’s High Commissioner to India, Cameron Mackay, and it was proposed that some diplomatic missions to India be scaled back. The MEA confirmed that these missions were engaged in internal Indian affairs.
The MEA immediately refuted Mr. Trudeau’s claims, branding them “baseless,” but made it clear that it wasn’t only Nijjar who intended to turn Canada into a “safe haven” for India’s separatist violence, despite India’s request for their extradition. According to the Foreign Ministry, Canada would not accept applications for any other missions overseas and India has also stopped providing visa services to the entire country of Canada, citing security concerns.
Reply of ‘Five Eyes’ Alliance in India Canada Tension
Reply of Five Eyes Alliance on India Canada Tension: After a week of complaints from Canada and an invitation to assist India in the inquiry, each of the five-eyed nations has released comments expressing concern. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Foreign Ministers of Australia Penny Wong, the United Kingdom’s James Chuter Ede, and New Zealand’s Nanaia Mahuta have all made remarks on behalf of the United States. None have, however, gone any further in bolstering Canada’s allegations, with their responses being wholly in opposition. The “Skripal case” in Britain, where the British government charged Russian operatives of poisoning a former Russian spy and his daughter, is comparable to the current circumstance.
Each of the five-eyed nations quickly ejected a number of Russians from their capitals, sending a message that they would not hesitate to act in defiance of New Delhi as they intensified their cooperation plan with India. The U.S. won’t provide India any “special exemption” if Mr. Trudeau’s claims are confirmed, according to Jake Sullivan, the nation’s national security advisor. (India Canada Tension)The United States has proudly claimed targeted killings of named terrorists through drone strikes or operations, involving fatalities, such as the killing of Iranian General Soleimani in Iraq or the announced death of Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. While Indian officials have denied involvement in any killings of former Indian politicians, the “Western double standards” have been criticized. However, allegedly, such examination is necessary given India’s activities.
Root Cause of India Canada Tension
The Cause of India Canada Tension: The Khalistan question has long been a source of increasing hostility between India and Canada. The main cause of the tension is that Indian Prime Ministers have frequently been excluded from bilateral visits between Canada and India, with the exception of Manmohan Singh’s visit between 1973 and 2015. (India Canada Tension)Singh had been to Toronto in 2010 to attend the G20 conference, which was held there. This was due to the fact that Khalistani activity gathered steam in the late 1970s, when a separatist movement in Punjab garnered support, especially among the Sikh diaspora in nations like Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Canada emerged as the most difficult nation for India to communicate with about its concerns, as the Canadian government and lawmakers took a position that many perceived as dodging responsibility for harboring human rights violators who were eluding the Indian security forces in Punjab. For instance, Canada refused to extradite Khalistani leader Talwinder Singh Parmar when India requested it in 1982. A bombing plan directed against Air India Flight 182 from Toronto to Mumbai in June 1985 was masterminded by Parmar a few years earlier, killing 329 people.